Links to some ballistics studies are included below. This takes us back to the “gotta be able to poke holes in ’em in the first place” argument. little things I like to call “facts” and “empirical evidence”) it probably won’t make much difference which caliber you put holes into someone with-at least within the. But if you look at results from actual shootings (i.e. I know, that’s going to get the sacred cow lovers riled up. It probably doesn’t matter which round you shoot anyway. For example, if you can put the rounds where you want them consistently with Caliber X, but you can’t rack the slide because of an old injury in your hand, you should obviously reconsider whether that weapon is an appropriate choice. The type of weapon, its trigger, and the specific ammunition type all come into play here in the context of muzzle control and the ability to manipulate the weapon in non-shooting matters. Alternatively, if you can ring head-sized steel with a 10mm at the 15-yard line but can barely put those rounds into a paper torso with your support hand at the same range, you need to be using less gun. 2 To wit, if you can’t drive the gun effectively within household or close-encounter ranges with just your support hand, you are using too much gun. My personal philosophy is predicated on the “support-hand only” perspective when I am asked to teach a friend or loved one how to shoot or which gun to buy. on command?Ģ) Do you have the mental, emotional, and moral fortitude to put the metal into the meat when it’s called for? Without it, many significant problems can arise during the Event, as well as afterward, in your head. My preference, if asked, is based on two considerations:ġ) Do you have the physical capability and skill to deliver it where it needs to go when it needs to go there, on demand vs. *GASP* Just carry one you can use effectively based upon your abilities. That simple fact drastically and incontrovertibly changes the bullet debate. It just means that the previously “smaller/lesser/weaker/whatever” round is now as-good-as or better than the one that was extolled as the superior choice a decade or two ago. 380 will almost certainly yield similar benefits to a 10mm.īut this is not, as some might assert, necessarily a reason to go with the “bigger/better/faster/harder/whatever” bullet. The same advances apply equally to most other calibers.įor instance, technological advances that improve the potential lethality of a. Today’s 9mm rounds are markedly superior in performance compared to the ones that were around when I first began carrying a gun professionally in the very early 90s. It’s just that ammunition today is more effective than its forbearers in every caliber. This doesn’t mean the laws of physics have changed. It’s indisputable that advances in metallurgy, materials, and know-how have completely altered the dynamics of ballistics article today vis-à-vis ballistics articles of the 70s and 80s. Modern caliber arguments are only important if they are conducted in a civil and academic manner. I don’t care what you think, you’re a putz, take me to the articles.ġ. As I find studies and articles about the matter, I’ll drop an excerpt in here with a link back to the originating author and publication.īefore beginning that list, let me state that these are my opinions on the subject of any caliber that is intended to be used as a self-defense cartridge. This is my effort at helping you do that. You’ll have to parse through the information available, perform your own due diligence, and make your own decisions. Although I’m plenty opinionated, I’m neither a ballistician nor an ammunition SME. Rather, it’s a collection portal for other articles about it. This article is not meant to serve as my opinion on the matter (which will doubtless outrage many people). 380 caliber has many detractors for a number of reasons, but then so does the 9mm. 380 ACP cartridge is “underpowered.” Its ballistic performance, however, really isn’t the point (cue outraged comments). 9mm argument doesn’t seem like much of an argument. The “.380 is underpowered” debate is one of many ongoing “caliber controversies” in the gun-owning and gun-carrying community. (This includes, by the way, the Browning 1911-380 in. And anyway, the ongoing release of new firearms always sparks new-old arguments. So we’re going to do the obvious thing - we are going to get people riled up by arguing about the. Today is the 120th anniversary of the pocket pistol 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |